Legal Opinion

People v. Estrada

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2017No. S232114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cuéllar, J.

*665 Under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, certain inmates may file a "recall" petition to reduce their punishment for third-strike sentences imposed on them for offenses that are neither serious nor violent felonies. ( Pen. Code § 1170.126, subds. (b), (e).) When a court evaluates a petition to **29 recall such a sentence, may it find an inmate ineligible for relief because certain facts underlying a previously dismissed count show the inmate was "armed with a firearm or deadly weapon" during the commission of the third strike offense? (See §§ 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iii),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. RomanowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. Cruz, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. Banda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Saelee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. BandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API