Legal Opinion

People v. Dickerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 2004No. H026484PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALSH, J.

A criminal defendant resolved three cases involving six felony charges by a plea agreement that cut his possible prison time in half, with a guaranteed maximum and minimum of 12 years. Before entering his no contest pleas, the defendant acknowledged that the court “must impose a restitution fine of between $200 and $10,000.” At sentencing, without objection by the defendant, the court imposed restitution fines totaling $6,800 as calculated in the probation report pursuant to a formula recommended by the Legislature in Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (b)(2).1 The court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. VillalobosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re DeLunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. KnoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. VillalobosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API