Legal Opinion
Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 30, 2016No. 12-55911PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL DANIEL CUERO, No. 12-55911 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:08-cv-02008-BTM-WMC MATTHEW CATE, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 5, 2015 Pasadena, California Filed June 30, 2016 Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Barry G. Silverman, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain 2 CUERO V. CATE SUMMARY* Habeas Corpus…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sarah Weeden v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Sharemaster v. U.S. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.