Legal Opinion

State v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1991No. 903SC399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain out-of-court statements made by Nicky Taylor pursuant to N.C.R. Evid. 801(d)(E). He argues that the State failed to establish a prima facie case of conspiracy independent of these statements, and therefore the out-of-court statements are hearsay and inadmissible. We do not agree.

“One well-recognized exception to the general proscription against the introduction of hearsay evidence is that statements made by coconspirators during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy are admissible.” State v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API