Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 104PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The record discloses that defendant’s motion for nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence was denied. Defendant thereupon offered evidence in his own behalf, and the State examined a witness in rebuttal. Both the State and the defendant then rested, but. defendant’s motion for dismissal or judgment as of nonsuit was not renewed. Nevertheless, failure to nonsuit is assigned as error and argued in the briefs filed in the Court of Appeals and in this Court.

G.S. 15-173 provides that the failure of the defendant to renew his motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API