State v. Abernathy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendants file separate briefs. Some of the same or similar assignments of error are brought forward in each brief, while other assignments of error pertain only to each individual’s appeal. We will first consider those questions presented jointly by defendants.
Abernathy’s and Jaynes’ Joint Appeal
Defendants first insist that the trial court erred in refusing to allow them to cross-examine the State’s witness Ronald Clark, an admitted accomplice, concerning his expectation of leniency as a result of his testimony; this, defendants argue, was necessary to establish Clark’s bias…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.