Legal Opinion

Breiner v. Sunderland

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2006No. 27889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney Myles S. Breiner petitions this court for a writ of prohibition or other relief with regard to disciplinary investigations being conducted by Special Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Respondent Magali V. Sunder-land, on behalf of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC). We grant the petition and order that:(1) Disciplinary Counsel shall forthwith remove Sunderland from further participation in any investigation involving Breiner;(2) Disciplinary Counsel shall assign other assistant disciplinary counsel, within the time specified infra, to review the files and make recommendations for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Cariglia v. Bar CounselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Gracia v. Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Locricchio v. The Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Locricchio v. The Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ostendorp v. Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Schoettle v. Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API