Legal Opinion

De Gracia v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2014No. SCPW-14-0001375Published

1Opinion of the Court

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0001375 30-DEC-2014 10:15 AM SCPW-14-0001375 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I CLAUDETTE DE GRACIA, Petitioner, vs. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL and CRAIG FURUSHO, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of the record, we conclude the decision of Respondent Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) to decline to further investigate Petitioner’s allegations against Respondent Furusho is within the discretion of ODC…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Barnett v. BroderickHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Breiner v. SunderlandHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API