Legal Opinion

Schoettle v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2016No. SCPW-16-0000491Published

1Opinion of the Court

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-16-0000491 15-JUL-2016 10:04 AM SCPW-16-000491 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I WALTER R. SCHOETTLE, Petitioner, vs. THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, and RICHARD A. PLATEL, CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondents. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of the May 10, 2016 petition for a writ of mandmamus submitted by Petitioner attorney Walter R. Schoettle, this court concludes nothing in the petition or the attached exhibits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Breiner v. SunderlandHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API