Legal Opinion
In Re the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme Court
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1999No. 22093PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
2Per curiam
A complaining witness seeks review of actions taken by the Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court (Disciplinary Board) and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC). For the reasons stated below, we consider the request for review as a petition for writ of mandamus and deny the petition.
I. RELEVANT FACTS
A. Background Litigation Between the Complaining Witness and the Attorney
This saga began when the Complaining Witness and Respondent Attorney terminated a long-term personal and professional relationship in which the Complaining Witness had worked as an investigator…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Ramon Azurin Gregorio Araneta v. William Von Raab, in His Capacity as Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Barnett v. BroderickHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Straub Clinic & Hospital v. KochiHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by52 opinions
- Hanabusa v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Breiner v. SunderlandHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Adolescent & Family Institute of Colorado, Inc. v. Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Behavioral HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Acuna v. Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- De Gracia v. Office of Disciplinary CounselHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.