Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 2, 2006No. 47, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, through Bar Counsel (“Petitioner”) and in conformance with Maryland Rule 16- 751 1 , filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Respondent, Kenneth Stanford Ward, alleging violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.1 (Competence) 2 , 1.2(a), (b), and (c) (Scope of Representation) 3 , 1.3 (Diligence) 4 , 1.4(a) and (b) (Communica tion) 5 ,1.5(a) (Fees) 6 , 3.3(a)(1) (Candor Toward the Tribunal) 7 , 5.3(c) (Responsibilities Regarding Non Lawyer Assistants) 8 , 8.1(a) and (b) (Bar Admission and Disciplinary 8.1(a) and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API