Legal Opinion
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1985No. C4-84-981, CO-84-1223PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
This case involves two petitions by attorney N.P. (petitioner) for a writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus, or other relief, one restraining the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (director) from enforcing Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and ordering him to dismiss or limit his disciplinary investigation of petitioner and the second ordering the director to revise the charges issued against petitioner and dismiss those based upon DR 1-102, DR 2-203, DR 5-105, and DR 5-106 of the Minnesota Code of Professional Responsibility. These petitions are…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- In re HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BraskeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.