Legal Opinion
Adam v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 20, 1992No. 590-89CPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
The pending cross-motions for summary judgment ask the court to decide whether the plaintiffs, Senior Border Patrol Agents employed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), are entitled to overtime benefits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Pub.L. No. 75-718, 52 Stat. 1060 (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1988)). Defendant claims that the plaintiffs are exempt from the provisions of the FLSA because their duties are primarily “administrative.” For the reasons stated below, the court finds that plaintiffs are entitled to overtime…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Gregory B. Dymond and Samuel K. Gibbons v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Crocker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Aamold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.