Legal Opinion

Aamold v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 12, 1997No. 94-638CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The issues are whether security officers’ 30-minute meal periods are compensable as overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a) (1994) (the “FLSA”), and, if so, whether certain officers nevertheless fall under an executive or administrative exemption to the FLSA overtime provisions. 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1).

FACTS

The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. Plaintiffs are approximately 175…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hertz v. Woodbury County, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API