Aamold v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The issues are whether security officers’ 30-minute meal periods are compensable as overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a) (1994) (the “FLSA”), and, if so, whether certain officers nevertheless fall under an executive or administrative exemption to the FLSA overtime provisions. 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1).
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. Plaintiffs are approximately 175…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hertz v. Woodbury County, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.