Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 30, 1992No. 90-162CPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.
This case is before the court on the parties’ eross-motions for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the cross-motions in part and denies in part.
FACTS
This is a consolidated action by approximately 5400 individuals in seven federal agencies seeking overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1992) (FLSA). Plaintiffs are criminal investigators in the GS-1811 series in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF), Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Internal Revenue Service (IRS),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Stephen S. Adams v. James F. Hinchman, Acting Comptroller General of the United States General Accounting OfficeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Christofferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Aamold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.