Legal Opinion
Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1993No. S-4477PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case involves claims made by Guy W. Dayhoff against Temsco Helicopter Pilots, Inc. (Temsco), for unpaid prevailing wages and overtime wages. Dayhoff appeals from the Summary Judgment dismissing his claims. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This is the second time this case has been before this court. See Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc., 772 P.2d 1085 (Alaska 1989). Dayhoff was employed by Temsco as a helicopter pilot at various times during 1982 and 1983. Id. at 1086. After leaving Temsco, Dayhoff initiated proceedings…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hageland Aviation Services, Inc. v. HarmsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Era Aviation, Inc. v. LindforsAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.