Legal Opinion

Lindblom v. Johnston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1916No. 13129PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered March 6, 1915, in favor of the plaintiff, upon withdrawing the case from the consideration of the jury, in an action for contribution.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The facts giving rise to the present cause of action, briefly stated, are the following: Some time prior to July 16, 1900, one Joseph H. Wright was appointed postmaster of the post office at Nome, Alaska. On the day named, he qualified as such by giving bond to the United States in the penal sum of $20,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties. His sureties on the bond were Erik O. Lindblom, Jafet Lindeberg, E. W. Johnston, Bernard Niebling, Alex/Allardyce, W. H. Ferguson, Frank J. Lackie, Virgil Moore, and Alonzo Rawson. Subsequently Wright defaulted in his accounts, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Caldwell v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City of Seattle v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Warren v. RicklesWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Halver v. WelleWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Ecology v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API