Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Basilides

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1943No. 29157PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.

This is an action for the partition of real estate and for an accounting of the income obtained by the defendant in possession. Judgment of default was entered against defendant Ruth Allison.

At the conclusion of the trial, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered its decree of partition. The decree provided (1) that each of plaintiffs had an undivided one-sixth interest in two pieces of real estate, one at 5203 First avenue northwest, known as the “big house,” and the other at 326 West Forty-first street, known as the “little house,” both properties being situated…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Graves v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1908

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Arnold v. MelaniWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Rutter v. RutterWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Doenz v. GarberWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API