Legal Opinion

Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1919No. 14577PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King’ county, Tallman, J., entered November 7, 1917, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action by a carrier to recover freight charges.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action the appellant, a common carrier by railroad, seeks to recover from the respondent, a shipper over its line of railroad, the difference between certain charges made for carrying freight and the sums it was required to charge by its printed and published tariff schedules. A demurrer to the complaint, based on the grounds that facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action were not stated and that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law, was interposed and sustained by the court. From a judgment of dismissal, entered after the appellant had elected to stand…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Fratt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  4. Gardner v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Warren v. RicklesWashington Supreme Court · 1924

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API