Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Department of Ecology v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1980No. 46859PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This is a suit by the Attorney General to enjoin the drilling of water wells, allegedly in violation of RCW 18.104. The complaint alleged that the defendant had also engaged in deceitful practices in violation of RCW 19.86, the Consumer Protection Act. In addition to injunc-tive relief, the Attorney General sought restitution to consumers allegedly harmed by the defendant's activities, as well as statutory penalties and its costs and attorney fees.
The Superior Court granted the defendant's motion for jury trial, and the correctness of that ruling is before us for review.
Under Const, art. 1, §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Dexter Horton Building Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Pasco v. MacEWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Emwright v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Alpine Industries, Inc. v. GohlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.