Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Hurley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1906No. 5865PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierca county, Chapman, J., entered July 6, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action against a surety for contribution.

1Opinion of the CourtCbow, J.

This action was commenced by respondent, Trank M. Caldwell, against appellant, Harry Hurley, for contribution as co-surety on a promissory note. Tram a final judgment in favor of said Caldwell, this appeal has been taken.

Appellant demurred to the amended complaint, for the reasons, (1) that it did not state facts sufficient to- constitute a cause of action, and (2) that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law. This demurrer being overruled, appellant answered, denying allegations of the amended complaint, and affirmatively pleading the statute of limitations. Upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co. v. Puget Sound Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Warren v. RicklesWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lindblom v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Halver v. WelleWashington Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API