Legal Opinion

Quality Brands, Inc. v. Barry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 27, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Plaintiff Quality Brands Inc. has moved for summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that the District of Columbia’s Wholesale Liquor Industry Storage Act of 1986 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional, and it seeks an injunction of enforcement of the Act. Defendant has filed a cross-motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment. Quality Brands argues that the Act, which prohibits sale in the District of Columbia of liquor which is stored outside the District, violates the Commerce Clause because it discriminates against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  2. Dickerson v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Milton S. Kronheim & Company, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Dickerson v. BaileyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
  5. Indiana Wholesale Wine & Liquor Co. v. State Ex Rel. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API