Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1979No. 77-1439PublishedCited by 747 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question presented for decision is whether Okla. Stat., Tit. 29, § 4-115 (B) (Supp. 1978), violates the Commerce Clause, Art. I, § 8, cl. 3, of the United States Constitution, insofar as it provides that “ [n] o person may transport or ship minnows for sale outside the state which were seined or procured within the waters of this state ...”1

*324Appellant William Hughes holds a Texas license to operate a commercial minnow business near Wichita Falls, Tex. An Oklahoma game ranger arrested him on a charge of violating § 4-115 (B) by transporting from Oklahoma to Wichita Falls a load of natural…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by747 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

742 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API