Legal Opinion

Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1970No. 301PublishedCited by 2,011 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The appellee is a company engaged in extensive commercial farming operations in Arizona and California. The appellant is the official charged with enforcing the Arizona Fruit and Vegetable Standardization Act. A provision of the Act requires that, with certain exceptions, all cantaloupes grown in Arizona and offered for sale must “be packed in regular compact arrangement in closed standard containers approved by the supervisor . ...” Invoking his authority under that provision, the appellant issued an order prohibiting the appellee company from transporting uncrated cantaloupes from its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,011 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

2,006 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API