Legal Opinion

Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 25, 1990No. Civ. A. S 88-2540PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SMALKIN, District Judge.

This antitrust case is before the Court on motions of all defendants to dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6). There has been thorough briefing by all parties, and the motion will be decided without oral argument, as permitted by Local Rule 105(6), D.Md.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Sun Dun, Inc., is in the business of marketing and servicing vending machines as a “full service vendor.” 1 Defendants Coca-Cola and PepsiCo manufacture trademarked, secret formula soft drink syrup and sell it to licensed, franchised…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United Food & Commercial Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Jones v. Koons Automotive, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. In re Aggrenox Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  4. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API