Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. Bailey
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 11, 2000No. CIV. A. H-99-1247PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced action, challenging as violative of the Commerce Clause of the federal Constitution Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code Ann. § 107.07 (Vernon 1995), prohibiting Texans from importing for their personal use more than three gallons of wine without being required to hold a permit unless that resident “personally accompanies] the wine or liquor as it enters the state,” are Plaintiffs C.A. Dickerson, Roland R. Pennington, and David Vukovic’s motion for summary judgment (instrument # 8) and Defendant Doyne…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC v. HudginsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
- Bolick v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- Bainbridge v. BushDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- Dickerson v. BaileyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- Glazer's Wholesale Drug Co., Inc. v. KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.