United States v. 99.66 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEEP, Chief District Judge:
Defendants/Appellants Stewart Title & Trust Co. and Sunburst Investments, Incorporated, the respective titleholder and beneficial owner of land involved in this suit, appeal the judgment in an eminent domain proceeding, contending that the district court erred in excluding valuation and damages testimony and also erred in denying their motion for a new trial. Appellant Southern Leasing appeals an order requiring it to pay restitution of the amount by which the government’s pre-paid estimated compensation to the parties exceeded the jury award. Jurisdiction in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- James A. Murray, Justin L. Murray and Joan M. Murray v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Enrique Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles Darryl Gates, Police Chief John Schiffner John BackusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Chiron Corporation v. Genentech, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.