Legal Opinion
Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 6, 1995No. 93-3566PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Pro-Eco seeks damages against the Jay County Board of Commissioners (“the Board”) that allegedly stem from an illegal landfill moratorium ordinance (“ordinance” or “moratorium”) which the Board passed in 1989 to prevent Pro-Eco from building a landfill in Jay County. Pro-Eco obtained a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 invalidating the ordinance, and we affirmed that judgment on appeal. Pro-Eco v. Board of Comm’rs of Jay County, Ind., 956 F.2d 635 (7th Cir.1992) (‘Pro-Eco I”).
Pro-Eco now seeks further relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2202. It alleges under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Wyatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Dietchweiler Ex Rel. Dietchweiler v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Flying J Inc. v. City of New HavenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Anthony King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles GilkeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- William Hudson and Bishop Pamon v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.