United States v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The United States brought this suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky to condemn more than 250 acres of the respondents’ land for a federal development known as the Nolin Reservoir Project located in that State. An important issue in the case was raised by the respondents’ claim that 78 acres of the land, taken for construction of recreational facilities adjacent to the reservoir, had not been within the original scope of the project.1 A jury *15awarded the respondents $20,000 as just compensation for all the land taken. Upon an appeal by the respondents,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.