Legal Opinion

Nollan v. California Coastal Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 1987No. 86-133PublishedCited by 1,258 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

James and Marilyn Nollan appeal from a decision of the California Court of Appeal ruling that the California Coastal Commission could condition its grant of permission to rebuild their house on their transfer to the public of an easement across their beachfront property. 177 Cal. App. 3d 719, 223 Cal. Rptr. 28 (1986). The California court rejected their claim that imposition of that condition violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as incorporated against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Ibid. We noted probable jurisdiction. 479 U. S. 913 (1986).

I

The Nollans own a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,258 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

1,253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API