Chiron Corporation v. Genentech, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
After a jury trial, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California entered judgment in favor of Genentech that all claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,054,561 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102 because none of the asserted claims is entitled to priority to a series of applica*1250tions filed in 1984, 1985, and 1986. Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc., No. Civ. S-00-1252 WBS GGH (Sept. 9 & Oct. 23, 2002). Because Chiron did not adequately disclose or support the subject matter of its '561 patent in its 1984, 1985, or 1986 applications, this court affirms the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- LizardTech, Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enters.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Monsanto Company v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.