Legal Opinion
City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 25, 2007No. 17305, 17306PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
In these consolidated proceedings, the city of Bristol (city), the plaintiff in the first case and the defendant in the second case, appeals from the judgment of the trial court reassessing damages awarded to Tilcon, Inc. (Tilcon), 1 the defendant in the first case and the plaintiff in the second case, 2 for the city’s taking by condemnation of easements and other rights on 24.84 acres located within a 184 acre tract of unimproved land owned by Tilcon to remediate potentially contaminated groundwater emanating from the city landfill (statutory taking). 3 The city also…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- United Technologies Corp. v. Town of East WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Johnson v. Paynesville Farmers Union Cooperative Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rural Water Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Sanders v. DiasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.