Legal Opinion

White ex rel. Estate of McCullough v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 6, 2008No. 1:07-cv-529PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.

This Court has before it Defendant SmithKline Beechham Corporation’s Mo*1025tion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 71). Plaintiffs filed a response to the motion (Dkt. No. 97) and requested oral argument. As part of the response, Plaintiffs request leave to file an amended complaint in the event this Court decides to grant Defendant’s motion. Defendant filed a reply to the response (Dkt. No. 99). Having read the briefs, this Court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Bruce Collyer v. Gregory DarlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. In Re Trasylol Products Liability Litigation-MDL-1928District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  3. Bower v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. BORYCZ v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API