Legal Opinion
Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 14, 2000No. 98-4286PublishedCited by 532 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Allen Rose appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to amend his original complaint in this insurance coverage dispute. The district court issued a marginal entry order denying Rose’s motion to amend his complaint, but the district court failed to provide any explanation for its decision. Because the district court’s denial of the motion to amend without explanation qualifies as an abuse of discretion, and because this abuse of discretion does not amount to a harmless error, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of the motion to amend, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Paul Moore v. City of Paducah Mayor John Penrod Joe Viterisi, Harold Ford, Robert Coleman, and Joe Flynn, Commissioners Robert E. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Glen McMurphy v. City of Flushing, and Bernard Van Osdale, Vernon Royston, Individually and JointlyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Thiokol Corporation v. Department Of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by532 opinions
- Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Shari Guertin v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
527 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.