Legal Opinion
BORYCZ v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 21, 2011No. Case 1:10 oe 40001Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs opposition and Defendants’ reply thereto. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Brief Background
This case is one of many to arise out of the litigation involving the Ortho Evra® birth control patch. In March 2006, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, centralized all civil litigation in the Northern…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.