Legal Opinion
Knipe v. Smithkline Beecham
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2008No. Civil Action 06-3024PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are (1) Defendant GlaxoSmithKline’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Causes of Action, (2) the Response of Plaintiffs Harold L. Garrison, Jr., individually, and Marion Knipe, individually and as administratrix and administratrix ad pro-sequendum of the Estate of Harold Stanley Jake Garrison, and (3) Defendant’s Reply Brief. In addition, the Court jointly considers Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Evidence Submitted by GSK in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Causes of Action) and Defendant’s…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Snyder v. FARNAM COMPANIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson & Cordis Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Knipe v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Runner v. BardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.