State v. Bichsel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*259ROSSMAN, J.
Defendant appeals her convictions for tape recording a police radio broadcast without the consent of one of the participants, ORS 165.540(1)(a),1 and for tape recording a conversation with police officers without specifically informing them. ORS 165.540(l)(c). We reverse the conviction for recording the broadcast but affirm the conviction for recording the face-to-face conversation.
Defendant had had unpleasant interactions with the police as a result of her attempts to help and counsel young people at the Eugene Mall, many of whom had records of delinquency. At about 2 a.m. on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. StroupOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. RussoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- State v. KnobelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Hoosier Home Theater, Inc. v. AdkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. HaweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. NeffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Johnson v. HaweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. CarstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.