Legal Opinion
Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2023No. 22-35271PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PROJECT VERITAS; PROJECT No. 22-35271 VERITAS ACTION FUND, D.C. No. 3:20-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 01435-MO v. OPINION MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney; ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 7, 2022 Pasadena, California Filed July 3, 2023 Before: Carlos T. Bea, Sandra S. Ikuta,…
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Press v. McCrawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Alario v. KnudsenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
- Fouts v. BecerraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.