State v. Knobel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawfully obtaining contents of communications. -ORS 165.540(1) (c). He argues that the statute is unconstitutional under both the Oregon and United States Constitutions and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in failing to admit evidence of the victim’s bias. We reverse and remand.
In July, 1986, defendant, a reporter for a local newspaper, Freedom to Express, interviewed Deputy Graves of the Josephine County Sheriffs office. Graves testified at trial that, approximately five minutes after their conversation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BichselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. PrangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- State v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.