Legal Opinion

State v. Knobel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 19, 1989No. 86-454-M; CA A43491PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawfully obtaining contents of communications. -ORS 165.540(1) (c). He argues that the statute is unconstitutional under both the Oregon and United States Constitutions and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in failing to admit evidence of the victim’s bias. We reverse and remand.

In July, 1986, defendant, a reporter for a local newspaper, Freedom to Express, interviewed Deputy Graves of the Josephine County Sheriffs office. Graves testified at trial that, approximately five minutes after their conversation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. BichselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. PrangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  5. State v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API