Legal Opinion

State v. Carston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1995No. 93-CR-0259-TM 93-CR-0260-TM 93-CR-0261-TM and 93-CR-0229-ST CA A82360 (Control) CA A82363 CA A82364 and CA A82626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendants were charged with various counts of manufacture and delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. The state appeals the pretrial orders granting defendants’ motions to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand.

On March 19,1993, Officer Koertje of the Redmond Police Department received a telephone call from a private citizen in Eugene who wanted to report a drug transaction that was to take place during the early morning hours of March 20. The informant did not at first identify himself, but later called again and gave the police a name and telephone number. The informant reported…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BichselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CarstonOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API