State v. Neff
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*188BREWER, C. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unlawfully obtaining the contents of a communication, ORS 165.540(l)(c), assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. According to defendant, the statute proscribes obtaining a conversation only when not all of the participants have been specifically informed that the conversation is being obtained. It follows, defendant reasons, that he did not commit a crime by using his cell phone to record his conversation with a police officer during a traffic stop after the officer already had informed defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. J. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State of New Hampshire v. Paul A. CostellaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- State v. FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Project Veritas v. Michael SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.