Legal Opinion
State v. Stroup
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1980No. 78-32999, CA 16139, SC 27010PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*187TONGUE, J.
Defendant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle while his operator’s license had been suspended, in violation of ORS 487.560CL).1 He appealed to the Court of Appeals contending, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction in that the state had failed to prove that the Motor Vehicle Division had previously mailed to the defendant notice that his operator’s license had been suspended, as required by its own rules, by ORS 482.570,2 and also as a matter of constitutional due process.
In response, it was contended by the state that under the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. TooleyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Roberts v. Gray's Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.