Legal Opinion
United States v. Russo
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 1966No. Crim. 22154PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, Chief Judge.
This is a preliminary motion by defendant, Nicholas Russo, to suppress two categories of evidence secured by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (hereafter “FBI”). First, the Court is asked to suppress all items seized upon the execution of duly issued search and arrest warrants. Secondly, suppression is sought of all evidence secured by FBI inspection of the records of the Bell Telephone Company.
The relevant facts are as follows: For sometime prior to February 6, 1965, the FBI had inspected records of the Bell Telephone Company regarding calls made from the Gherry Hill,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Michael Joseph Gurleski and Dorothy Villafranca v. United States of America, Frank Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Howard Christine, Perry GraboskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. FocarileDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.