Legal Opinion

Maulhardt v. California Director of Public Works

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1959No. Civ. 23119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Phoenix Assurance Company of New York, as defendant, appeals from the portions of a judgment against it for “the sum of $11,791.87 together with interest thereon at the rate of seven percent per annum from the 15th day of February, 1956, and together with the sum of $2,000.00 attorney’s fees and cost of suit herein . . and, as plaintiff in intervention, said Phoenix Assurance Company, appeals from the remainder of the judgment, which provides that plaintiffs “recover from the defendant Frank B. Durkee, Director of the Department of Public Works, . . . the sum of $11,791.87 together with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 1st Olympic Corp. v. HawrylukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Santens v. SantensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. McKinnon v. McKinnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Q.S.W. Corp. v. MalickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Software Design & Application, Ltd. v. Price WaterhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API