Legal Opinion

Santens v. Santens

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1960No. Civ. 6073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

From decrees rendered in these two consolidated actions in favor of respondent George Henry Santens and against appellant Georgianna Santens, his wife, she appeals.

In the divorce action number 50649, the husband first alleged extreme cruelty of the wife, that there was no community property, and that by a property settlement agreement all property had been distributed to the respective parties in accordance therewith. Custody of the three minor children was sought by respondent.

Appellant wife answered; denied respondent’s fitness to have such custody; denied there was no community property;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Prouty v. ProutyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Ashwell v. AshwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Mathewson v. MathewsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Bialac v. BialacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Brasher v. BrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Grubaugh v. GrubaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API