Legal Opinion

Crogan v. Metz

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1956No. S. F. 19096PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Separate appeals have been taken by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action to recover secret profits in a real estate transaction.

The defendants Bert Metz and Dewey Letsinger and another real estate broker, William W. Mogan, shared office space in San Francisco but each carried on an independent real estate business. There is substantial evidence that, beginning in the early part of 1951, they engaged in the following activities.

The defendant Letsinger represented one Desiano who owned income property on Scott Street in San Francisco which he wished to sell for $165,000…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API