Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. McKinnon
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1960No. Civ. 24173PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from that portion of the judgment pertaining to the disposition of certain property in a divorce proceeding.
A résumé of the facts is as follows:
The parties were married on October 5, 1945. At the time of the marriage Mr. McKinnon did not have any property except a bank account in which, as he testified, there was approximately $5,000. At that time he was employed by a company at a monthly salary of approximately $500 per month.
Mrs. McKinnon, at the time of the marriage was employed by the Asbury Apartment Hotel at a monthly salary of $400. She also was the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Cecconi v. Cecconi (In Re Cecconi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Barnes v. McKendryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Nielson v. RuehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963