Legal Opinion
1st Olympic Corp. v. Hawryluk
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1960No. Civ. 6443PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an action involving a written contract for the alteration and improvement of a house; an oral agreement for the furnishing of “extras” in connection therewith; and the foreclosure of an incident mechanic’s lien. By its amended complaint the plaintiff, as contractor, alleged the execution and performance of a written contract by which the defendant was required to pay it $10,600, and upon which there was an unpaid balance of $4,100; alleged the furnishing of “extras” of the reasonable value of $1,120 ; and also alleged the filing of a mechanic’s lien for the total unpaid sum of $5,220.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Oldis v. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Linthicum v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.