Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Raines

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1944No. L. A. 18735PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury, by which defendants Ross H. Raines and Helen Louise Raines (who are colored Americans) are “enjoined and restrained from using, occupying or residing prior to the 1st day of January, 1950, upon . . . Lot No. 43 of the Palisades Tract in the [City of Pasadena,] County of Los Angeles, State of California,” and by which defendants Frank F. Winsell and Mary Win-sell, his wife (who are Caucasians), are “enjoined and restrained from permitting said defendants . . . [Raines], or any other person not of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API