Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1923No. Sac. No. 3291PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

Plaintiff in this case appeals. It appears that the parties to the action intermarried in and were residents of the state of California. After they had been married a number of years, the defendant went to Nevada and instituted an action for divorce against his wife, this plaintiff, on the ground of willful desertion, his complaint alleging, among other matters, that there was no community property of the parties. The defendant in that action, this plaintiff, being a nonresident, service upon her was directed to be made by publication, and a copy of the complaint and summons in this action…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API